If you haven't been following the fight over the legality of warrantless wiretapping, this case, involving lawyers working with the Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, is extremely important. When it was revealed that the Bush administration was wiretapping phonecalls without a warrant, lawsuits were filed -- but the "problem" was that the parties (such as the ACLU) that filed the lawsuits didn't have "standing" because they had no evidence that they, personally, were impacted by the warrantless wiretapping. This created a ridiculous Catch-22 situation. As long as the government hid its illegal activities and never said who it spied on, it could spy on anyone illegally. No one could bring a lawsuit, since there was no proof that they had been impacted by the illegal spying.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010
Court Says President Bush Violated Wiretapping Laws With Warrantless Wiretap
http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100331/1228088813.shtml
Labels:
Links
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment